Here we are for our first interview published in the English section. Today we will interview James Gallagher, Marketing Manager at FutureMark, who will speak about the recent Time Spy DirectX 12 benchmark. This is the second interview with Futuremark: here it is our interview with Oliver Baltuch, CEO of the company.
This benchmark has raised a bunch of questions by the people who use it and the enthusiast users. For example: why is the tessellation value so high? Why is the Asynchronous Compute feature so negligible? Why was the FL 11_0 used? And so on.
James will answer all these questions, and even more. Thanks to James we will discover new things about the future of the DirectX 12 and this Time Spy benchmark. Some example?
• Time Spy is the result of a debate between the main IHVs (AMD, Imagination Technology, Intel, NVIDIA), so it’s not the work of pure Futuremark will: who blame just this company doesn’t know how hard is to do a fair benchmark.
• NVIDIA has put much time and effort into Conservative Rasterization feature (It has the better implementation for sure) in previous years, but it seems that video games will not be able to take advantage of it for a long time yet.
• Futuremark is working on a DX12.1 benchmark, but we know that this Feature Level will be probably ignored by the video gaming industry (The next SM6.0 DX12 update will be added to FL 12_0, so the FL 12_0 will be the industry standard). Will it be a useful benchmark?
As you can see, many important things were said, so I invite you to read this interview with particular attention: I think the James interview contains a number of important points to be considered.
Pubblicato in: News, English Review
Tags: 3dmark , amd , benchmark , directx12 , intel , nvidia , time spy
Ancora nessun commento. Dicci tu per primo cosa ne pensi!
Per commentare fai login. Puoi connetterti anche con il tuo account Facebook, Google o Twitter. ![]()
Please wait...[Waiting for] AMD GPU Polaris & Vega (ex-Arctic Islands) (1109)
24/10/2016 17:11, turion64
NVIDIA e Nintendo insieme per una console: cosa c'è sotto? (11)
24/10/2016 16:43, Fottemberg
3Q16 per AMD: si torna a respirare, ma il futuro rimane nebbioso (1)
24/10/2016 15:40, gridracedriver
[Official Topic] AMD APU Kabini, Temash, Kaveri e... Carrizo (1412)
24/10/2016 15:21, Il nabbo di turno
Taglio di prezzi per le schede video AMD RX 460 e RX 470 (5)
24/10/2016 13:56, Fottemberg
LIQUY 240, in prova il dissipatore All-in-One di iTek (2)
24/10/2016 12:38, Masciale
Gli iPhone 7 europei sono effettivamente modelli di serie B? (2)
24/10/2016 11:27, Blobay
| [Official Topic] AMD APU Kabini, Temash, Kaveri e... Carrizo. Discutiamo le ultime novità sulle APU AMD basate su microarchitettura Bulldozer e Jaguar |
| [Waiting for] AMD GPU Polaris & Vega (ex-Arctic Islands). Discutiamo le ultime novità sulle GPU Polaris di AMD, senza dimenticarci di Vega! |
| [Official Topic] Nvidia Pascal GPU. Discutiamo le ultime novità sulle GPU Pascal di NVIDIA e su quanto ci aspetta in futuro! |
| [Official Topic] AMD "Zen". Discutiamo le ultime novità sulla microarchitettura x86 Zen di AMD e le CPU/APU in arrivo. |
| Buongiorno e buonasera. Il thread dedicato alle discussioni più futili e divertenti! Ogni forum che si rispetti ne ha uno, no? |
| Creative Sound Blaster e Windows 10/8.1/8/7/Vista. Dedicato a tutti i possessori delle schede audio di Creative Labs! |
| B&C; e la questone "degli articoli prezzolati". Perché B&C; è un portale diverso? |

Il Forum